http://glennagirl.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] glennagirl.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] section7mfu2013-02-28 09:00 am
Entry tags:

Poll Day - Is it Canon or Fanon?

The last Thursday of each month is Poll Day.  Let's talk about canon.

[Poll #1899268]

[identity profile] carabele.livejournal.com 2013-02-28 03:24 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm very much a traditionalist. I want any MFU story to reference canon in some way. If there is no canon as part of it, then honestly it just becomes generic fiction. Using the same character names doesn't make it MFU fanfic on its own.

Now the canon references can be small and subtle, but they do have to be there for me to enjoy a story. But realize just having the guys as enforcement agents for U.N.C.L.E. (at least for some years) is in itself a reference to canon.
Edited 2013-02-28 15:25 (UTC)

[identity profile] mrua7.livejournal.com 2013-02-28 05:27 pm (UTC)(link)
There are all little elements in a story that can be canon-based, but are so subtle that we don't realize it. Such as the conversations between the two, what we call banter. The routine of them walking into del Floria and the tinkle of the brass bell is canon. Giving a quick description of the grey walls of headquarters. So many little things that are canon, but are just taken for granted and I think, are not really thought of as canon. As Glenna said all these little things ring true of the TV series. The boys themselves are canon, if they're written true to characters, and even if it's in an AU story.

[identity profile] carabele.livejournal.com 2013-02-28 05:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, all those little elements you mentioned are canon, and that's what I meant with the references being small and subtle.

But real AU, where the guys are something other than U.N.C.L.E. agents and never were U.N.C.L.E. agents and there is really no supposed accepted premonition of U.N.C.L.E in their future (as in childhood stories), doesn't work for me as MFU fiction. It's fiction, and it might be enjoyable, but it just isn't MFU.

Like I said, I'm a traditionalist. [chuckle]
Edited 2013-02-28 17:44 (UTC)

[identity profile] carabele.livejournal.com 2013-02-28 05:56 pm (UTC)(link)
And not sure that was clear by I meant that the "accepted premonition of U.N.C.L.E. in their future": such IS indeed part of childhood stories (even if not referenced directly, the precursing is always there in some form), which is why they can work for me.
Edited 2013-02-28 17:58 (UTC)

[identity profile] mrua7.livejournal.com 2013-02-28 06:22 pm (UTC)(link)
I wasn't referring to that sort of AU, where they're other than UNCLE agents, I should have qualified that. I think AU stories that stay within the parameters of UNCLE, and show them still being agents bur have girlfriends/wives is acceptable as long as they're built around some canon.

Childhood stories set the backdrop for the future UNCLE agents, and in my Illya backstories I address how Illya's future habits (canon) habits originated, showing how he becomes the Illya working for UNCLE.

Let's face it the guys can only save the world so many times, and if one stays with only that concept, then the fandom could potentially become stale. Not that i don't love them saving the world....:D

Character background is important to me and part of the character growth. They're agents all the time, but they do have a personal life and a past. That fleshes them out. Otherwise they have the potential to be stereotypical and flat, or perhaps the word :"formulaic," says it better.

[identity profile] carabele.livejournal.com 2013-02-28 07:11 pm (UTC)(link)
So what you are saying is, just as I and Glenna have, that it is not MFU fanfic without a canon element. [grin]

[identity profile] mrua7.livejournal.com 2013-02-28 07:23 pm (UTC)(link)
MFU stories, yes, AU stories yes. Backstories can't really always involve canon as they take place in the past, but somehow if they can hint at future canon, that's a good thing. I feel they're a legitimate off shoots within UNCLE fanfic.
Edited 2013-02-28 19:24 (UTC)

[identity profile] the-wretching.livejournal.com 2013-03-01 01:17 am (UTC)(link)
Hmm... I think the very definition of "canon" is at issue here. Or, I should say, it is for me. I don't really know how to answer....

It seems like.... just using the characters (even without the same setting) is relying on canon. If Illya makes a sarcastic retort, or Napoleon can't stop himself from smiling at the waitress....isn't that canon?

Or do you mean something like...purposefully inserting into a story UNCLE trivia or specific references to characters/episodes etc. directly from the show?

[identity profile] the-wretching.livejournal.com 2013-03-01 02:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Meaning, everything, person, event, statement, that happens in the show... is canon.

That's what I was taking it to mean.

In which case, it isn't fanfiction if it doesn't use canon.
Even in an AU, if fundamental aspects of character are retained ---and if they weren't than the characters wouldn't be recognisable-- then the writer is using canon:

Even if you wrote a story about UNCLE-Zarblat on the planet Zarblat in the year 6930 with all different characters and no one remembered that New York or any of their agents existed, so long as it's an UNCLE adventure---defeating wily bad guys at great personal peril, then it's canon.

Or if you took Mr. Waverly and wrote a complex AU drama about him doing missionary work in the jungle and falling in love with a chess master....It's Waverly, so it's canon.

At least, that's my understanding of the word.
I feel like you must have a more rigid definition in mind in these poll questions otherwise I don't understand them. Hence my query. I'm curious what specifically you mean by canon. My interpretation is clearly too broad.

[identity profile] the-wretching.livejournal.com 2013-03-01 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks for this clarification, Glenna. Good examples.
Certainly there seems to be a little wiggle room for subjectivity, but I do feel clearer on what you're getting at.

And the poll answers are quite interesting. I wonder how much the poll-takers would differ on their definitions of canon....what examples of stories/elements they might use to demonstrate canon/not...

A thought-provoking poll.

[identity profile] jkkitty.livejournal.com 2013-03-01 05:04 pm (UTC)(link)
I do like some of Canon in the story as it will take me back to the show, however, I think so many writers have added things to their versions that refer to canon but enriches it. I only have problems when the writer completely reverse what is going on in Canon with their writing.

[identity profile] reapermum.livejournal.com 2013-03-01 08:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Coming late to the party here.

I don't necessarily need more than the feel of canon for a story to work. But what does throw me out of a story is going against canon. I know it sounds silly, but I was completely nonplussed when an agent looked out of a window in HQ and they weren't in Waverley's office. And similarly someone opened a door that had hinges in HQ.

[identity profile] reapermum.livejournal.com 2013-03-02 12:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Why shouldn't she have an office? Is it hers alone or is she hot desking?

[identity profile] reapermum.livejournal.com 2013-03-02 07:40 pm (UTC)(link)
If we've never seen Illya's office, where was he doing the typing we saw?

[identity profile] reapermum.livejournal.com 2013-03-02 08:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know, it's nearly 50 years since it was on TV here, and I don't have the DVDs.

[identity profile] reapermum.livejournal.com 2013-03-02 08:32 pm (UTC)(link)
There's a good chance I wouldn't actually watch them, I have some films and box sets bought for my birthday and Christmas that I haven't even opened.

[identity profile] reapermum.livejournal.com 2013-03-02 09:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Only reason I was dropping in and out of "Mosquito Squadron" while doing other things.

[identity profile] reapermum.livejournal.com 2013-03-02 12:03 pm (UTC)(link)
It's either a continuity error or a flat screen display nearly 50 years ahead of its time.