My attention was hijacked by the topic of the Return Movie, that little bit of MFU that either disappoints entirely or piques one's interest in the possibilities of something different.
I don't hate it, don't love it. I do find it interesting and, as many who might read this will already know, I have a series of stories based around it and the whole Vanya thing. As for the movie itself, I found this article and think it's worth a read as a prelude to a discussion; you can find it HERE
One of the things the writer points out is how different the two main men were in their appearance, primarily how well each had aged. As we mostly will agree he mentions that David McCallum is looking very good, not much different from his 60's Kuryakin, while Robert Vaughn seems much older than 50. I'm paraphrasing but that's the gist of it. And I agree, and I wonder what kind of a difference that made to the success of the film; was RV just too removed from his days as the young and dashing Napoleon Solo to satisfy the viewers?
Of course that has nothing to do with the script or the fact that the two main characters spent so little time on screen together, which was the whole point of a reboot of the series. Their chemistry is what made the show work, so to lose that to a miscue in the scriptwriting department was very disappointing.
Having said that, the McCallum scenes are gold to me, I watch the movie and fast forward to every frame that features him. I know I can't be the only one doing that.
So, anything you want to say or discuss about this not quite engaging movie?

I don't hate it, don't love it. I do find it interesting and, as many who might read this will already know, I have a series of stories based around it and the whole Vanya thing. As for the movie itself, I found this article and think it's worth a read as a prelude to a discussion; you can find it HERE
One of the things the writer points out is how different the two main men were in their appearance, primarily how well each had aged. As we mostly will agree he mentions that David McCallum is looking very good, not much different from his 60's Kuryakin, while Robert Vaughn seems much older than 50. I'm paraphrasing but that's the gist of it. And I agree, and I wonder what kind of a difference that made to the success of the film; was RV just too removed from his days as the young and dashing Napoleon Solo to satisfy the viewers?
Of course that has nothing to do with the script or the fact that the two main characters spent so little time on screen together, which was the whole point of a reboot of the series. Their chemistry is what made the show work, so to lose that to a miscue in the scriptwriting department was very disappointing.
Having said that, the McCallum scenes are gold to me, I watch the movie and fast forward to every frame that features him. I know I can't be the only one doing that.
So, anything you want to say or discuss about this not quite engaging movie?

no subject
Date: 2015-09-13 02:26 pm (UTC)A weird side bar; I've always wondered why Robert switched parting his hair to the other side. I think he always looked better with the way he parted it while filming the original series.
I guess actors try to do somethings to change their appearance to disassociate themselves from previous roles, like the way David grew his hair so long (not a good look for him, but neither were those awful checked or plaid jackets he wore either. week)
no subject
Date: 2015-09-13 03:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-13 07:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-14 05:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-14 06:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-16 07:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-14 08:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-16 07:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-13 03:01 pm (UTC)My movie is also very short. It consists only of their shared scenes. Thank goodness for chapter skip.
no subject
Date: 2015-09-13 07:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-13 05:12 pm (UTC)The loud UNCLE agent that worked with Napoleon must have been a relative of one of the producers. Why else would he have been hired? He was way too load and annoying and detracted from the movie.
Perhaps they could have used less actors in the assault scene (Which I guess was supposed to be a spectacular highlight of the film) and spent that money on BETTER actors.
What about the lack of gorgeous females at UNCLE headquarters?
"Girl Friday" was "Girl Horrible."
Then there's the music. Why did the bother to change it from the original? It was already recorded and would have appealed the to the original audience, including myself.
I didn't think Robert looked older that 50, but compared to David, who always appears younger than his actual age, Robert seemed the older of the pair.
Too many mistakes on the part of producers and directors caused this movie, which should have led the way for a return of the series, to be a lackluster flop.
That's my opinion, anyway.
no subject
Date: 2015-09-13 07:12 pm (UTC)Honestly, this makes me want to get the movie out and watch it.
no subject
Date: 2015-09-13 08:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-13 05:39 pm (UTC)Of them not being together...I had a feeling they'd economised on the scriptwriters (I get that feeling a lot in modern movies) and clever dialogue wasn't in the budget.
no subject
Date: 2015-09-13 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-13 06:24 pm (UTC)Years later, I saw an early episode of Hustle and there was a moment that RV smiled Napoleon's smile. It was like, finally, Solo was back. And that's what I wished had happened in Return.
no subject
Date: 2015-09-13 06:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-13 07:08 pm (UTC)For my part I've created my reasons for each man's actions in the House of Vanya series. This one relates to Napoleon's departure...http://archiveofourown.org/works/344497